1.0.0

Understand Options

Interfacing with Pods

Code Integration Guides

User Guides

Security

APPENDIX

Additional Resources

Understanding Returns

Understanding Returns

Call Option

Let's take the following call option and use it as our example:

Description

underlying asset

WETH

strike asset

USDC

option type

Call

exercise type

European

strike price

$700

spot price

$500

expiration

31 Dec 2020

current day

21 Nov 2020

premium

$20

In this example, the contract refers to a **call** option for **WETH:USDC** that can be exercised only at expiration on the **31 Dec 2020** as it is a **European** option with a strike price of **$700**, where** **the options market price, also called as** premium**, is** $20**. In other words, this option buyer paid $20 to have the option to buy the WETH for $700 from the option seller, who has an obligation to sell the underlying asset, once the option is exercised, regardless of the spot price the asset at the expiration.

The following scenarios could happen:

In this case, it would be profitable for the option buyer to exercise the call option as the asset would be sold for $200 discount from the prices in the market. In this situation, the option is *in-the-money* (ITM). Once exercising the option, the option buyer would have had the following (simplified) profit:

Profit = Spot price - Strike price - Premium

Profit = 900 - 700 - 20

Profit = $180

The same would happen to any spot price above the strike price + premium.

In this case, it doesn't make sense for the option buyer to exercise his option as it is possible to buy the underlying asset (WETH) for a cheaper price in the market. In this situation, we say that the option is *out-of-the-money *(OTM). As the option buyer paid the premium, we can say that he had a loss limited to the option's price, which is $20.

Loss = - $20

It is possible to see that for call options, the **loss is limited** to the premium, and the **profit is unlimited** as the price of the underlying asset increases, as shown in the graph below:

Put Option

Let's take the following call option and use it as our example:

Description

underlying asset

WETH

strike asset

aUSDC

option type

Put

exercise type

European

strike price

$400

spot price

$500

expiration

31 Dec 2020

current day

21 Nov 2020

premium

$30

In this example, the contract refers to a **put** option for **WETH:USDC** that can be exercised only at expiration on the **31 Dec 2020** as it is a **European** option with a strike price of **$400**, where** **the options market price, also called as** premium**, is** $30**. In other words, this option buyer paid $30 to have the option to sell the WETH for $400 to the option seller, who has an obligation to buy the underlying asset, once the option is exercised, regardless of the spot price the asset at the expiration.

The following scenarios could happen:

In this case, it would be profitable for the option buyer to exercise the put option as the asset would be sold for $100 more than the current price in the market. In this situation, the option is *in-the-money* (ITM). Once exercising the option, the option buyer would have had the following (simplified) profit:

Profit = Strike price - Spot Price - Premium

Profit = 400 - 300 - 30

Profit = $70

The same would happen to scenarios where the spot price is below the strike price until the asset's price reaches 0.

In this case, it doesn't make sense for the option buyer to exercise the option as it is possible to sell the underlying asset (WETH) for a higher price in the market. In this situation, we say that the option is *out-of-the-money *(OTM). As the option buyer paid the premium, we can say that he had a loss limited to the option's price, which is $30.

Loss = premium

Loss = - $30

It is possible to see that for put options, the **loss is limited** to the premium, and the **profit is restricted/limited** until the spot price of the underlying asset decreases until zero, as we can see in the graph below:

Last modified 10mo ago

Copy link